Current Location:Home > Other Ancient History

How did China's ancient centralized system evolve?

Centralized rule was the main political structure of ancient China, and unlike the divided political situation in medieval Europe, ancient Chinese governments always tried to take control of military matters.

Ancient HistoryAncient History

Centralized rule was the main political structure of ancient China, and unlike the divided political situation in medieval Europe, ancient Chinese governments always tried to take control of military matters, money, official jobs, and court cases. This system helped keep the country whole, organize big building projects, and keep society stable, but it also created long-term problems like slow government work, local pushback, and rigid rule. We can split the development of this system into four main parts: start, growth, strengthening, and highest point.

Establishment: Qin Dynasty – Laying the Groundwork for Centralization


The Qin Dynasty (221–207 BCE) marked the official beginning of China’s centralized political system.

  • Before the Qin united China, the Zhou Dynasty used a feudal system that finally led to a long time of division and civil war.
  • Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of Qin, ended the feudal lord system and started the “junxian zhi” – a way of governing through commanderies and counties – where local officials were chosen and removed directly by the central government.
  • The Qin government set the same standards for weights, measures, money, writing, and laws, which gave support to the centralized system in both rules and culture.
  • A basic centralized government structure was created, and the Three Lords and Nine Ministers helped the emperor run the country.


In this early stage, the centralized system was strict and too harsh because it depended a lot on tough laws and heavy labor duties, so the Qin Dynasty fell soon after it was founded, but its system laid the base for all later dynasties.

Development: Han to Sui – Refinement and Adaptation


From the Western Han to the Sui Dynasty, the centralized system was changed often and became more stable over time as it adjusted to new social and political conditions.

Western Han: Bolstering Central Authority

  • In the early Western Han, the government brought back some feudal states, a choice that finally caused the Rebellion of the Seven States.
  • Emperor Wu tried to cut down the power of princes and marquises by issuing the “Decree of Grace and Favor,” which made their lands smaller.
  • He started a way to pick officials called “xiaolian” (choosing people who were filial and honest), which made more people able to become government workers.
  • The central government took more control over money matters, business, and the exclusive right to make salt and iron.

Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties: Turmoil and Institutional Transition

  • Frequent wars during this time hurt the central government’s power, and strong noble families took control of the government and had a lot of influence.
  • Even though the country was divided, different tests of government systems were carried out, which prepared for the country to be united again in the end.

Sui Dynasty: Reunification and Institutional Innovation

  • The Sui Dynasty united China again and made local government structures simpler to take more control from the center.
  • It officially started the imperial examination system, which ended the nobles’ control over official jobs and let more people move up in society.
  • The Grand Canal was built, which made transportation better and helped the central government govern different areas more easily.

During this growth period, the centralized system changed from a system mainly based on military and political control to a more complete one that was supported by new government rules, idea guidance, and better ways to manage officials.

Consolidation: Tang and Song – Institutional Maturity


The Tang and Song dynasties were when ancient China’s centralized government became mature, as the government structures became more organized and worked better.

Tang Dynasty: The Three Departments and Six Ministries System

  • The Tang Dynasty used the “Three Departments and Six Ministries” system, which made each government’s job clear, limited the power of chancellors, and made the emperor’s power stronger.
  • The imperial examination system was expanded, drawing scholars from more different parts of society and building a government where people were chosen for their ability.
  • Later, the “fangzhen” (military commissioner) system led to local separation, which showed how weak the relationship between the central and local governments was in the Tang Dynasty.

Song Dynasty: Intensifying Imperial Control

  • The Song Dynasty brought military power under the central government and separated the command of the army from the ability to send troops to stop warlords from forming.
  • It made the number of civil servants much bigger and focused on governing through civilians instead of the military, which lowered the chance of military takeovers.
  • Money management, government work, and military command were all tightly controlled by the center, which made the centralized system even stronger.

By the Song Dynasty, centralized power was stable and very organized, so local forces could no longer challenge the central government’s authority.

Peak: Ming and Qing – Extreme Centralization


The Ming and Qing dynasties took China’s ancient centralized system to its highest point, with the emperor’s absolute rule reaching a level never seen before.

Ming Dynasty: Abolishing the Chancellorship

  • The Hongwu Emperor got rid of the position of chancellor and put the Six Ministries directly under his control to remove any possible limits on his power.
  • The Grand Secretariat became an advisory group instead of an independent government body, making sure all important decisions were made by the emperor.
  • Local government power was split between many officials to stop any single person from getting too much power.
  • Strict control over ideas and absolute ruling policies were used widely, which stopped people from disagreeing and made the emperor’s power stronger.

Qing Dynasty: Integrating Central Power

  • The Qing Dynasty took the government system from the Ming Dynasty and made it better, setting up the Grand Council to help the emperor make policies and decisions.
  • It governed border areas well and finished building a unified multi-ethnic country under strong central control.
  • The emperor’s absolute rule reached its highest point in history during the Qing Dynasty, with almost no rules to limit the emperor’s power.

At this highest stage, the centralized system was good at keeping the country united but became more and more rigid, slowly losing its ability to deal with internal problems and external challenges.

Characteristics and Impacts of the Evolution


Core Characteristics

  • The emperor’s power grew steadily while the power of ministers and local governments slowly decreased.
  • Government systems were improved little by little, changing from simple military control to a complete and well-run government structure.
  • Ideas were unified, and Confucianism was used as the main idea for governing the country.
  • There was always a struggle between the central and local governments throughout the whole development process.

Historical Impacts

  • Good effects: Keeping the country united, helping big building projects happen, promoting cultural mixing, and keeping society stable.
  • Bad effects: A tendency toward harsh rule, corrupt government workers, slow government work, and holding back social energy and new ideas.

Conclusion


The development of China’s ancient centralized system was a long process where the system became more centralized, organized, and controlled by the emperor. It started in the Qin Dynasty, grew through the Han to Sui dynasties, became mature during the Tang and Song dynasties, and reached its highest point in the Ming and Qing dynasties. This system had a big effect on China’s political structure, cultural identity, and historical path; it kept the country united and society stable well, but its extreme absolute rule and built-in rigidity finally slowed down social progress and modern changes.


Back to Top